login   password  artist portfolio  gallery portfolio  MYabsolutearts 
absolutearts.com
 
  NEWEST TRENDS |AMP| nbsp; help   |  media kit   |  about us   |  services   |  contact  
  NEWEST TRENDS .         SEARCH   .   BUY   .   JOIN   .   COLLECT   .   RESEARCH   .   READ  .   DISCUSS  

Art Blogs - Artblogs - Art Weblogs - absolutearts.com - wwar.com

 
Home » Archives » August 2008 » INTERVIEW WITH ARTIST SIGAL M. BUSSEL

[Previous entry: "SHAKE DOWN ll"] [Next entry: "BLAME THE ECONOMY"]

08/08/2008: "INTERVIEW WITH ARTIST SIGAL M. BUSSEL"


L.A.-based Sigal Bussel came to her art from a nontraditional background. She earned a BA in Economics from UCLA and an MBA from Harvard Business School. She spent a considerable amount of time volunteering for various public and charitable organizations.

While working on Wall Street, Bussel felt a rising need to make a difference. Art became her way of reaching out to the world. She has exhibited around the U.S, China, Israel and Mexico, and has also been commissioned to work on a number of public art projects. To see more visit www.sigalbussel.com.

Laurie: You just came back from Beijing a couple of months ago?

Sigal: What a remarkable experience. I had a solo exhibition at the Beijing World Art Museum. It was very humbling to be one of the only foreign artists to exhibit during the period leading up to the Olympic games. It made it that much more special.




Laurie: How did they receive your work in China?

Sigal: They were really embracive, which was nice to see. It is amazing to be in another country and have people from a different culture experience my work. Most of my work is very large scale...

Laurie: How large?

Sigal: The paintings are over ten feet, and the sculptures start at nine feet and go to 100 feet. In China there is room for large-scale work... the exhibition spaces are larger. They are very open to foreign art that is coming in. Because my work has chains and a lot of other materials, I did not know what the reaction would be in China, but I was pleasantly surprised.

I was fortunate to arrive in Beijing early and had the opportunity to create two pieces there. It was wonderful to bring my experience in Beijing – working in a different country, interacting with a different culture – into my work.


Laurie: You were telling me how you came upon the sticks you used in your installation.

Sigal: I was looking for chains and we were in a market, one of those small markets, and all of sudden I ran by wood sticks – barbeque skewers – and it reminded me of my childhood. We used to play this game - we would drop the sticks and pick them up one by one...

Laurie: Pick Up Sticks.

Sigal: (laughs) In Israel we called it something different. Dukim...

It was great to be in the market – thousands of miles from home – and all of a sudden see something that was so simple that reminded me of my childhood. I bought the sticks and I did not know why I was buying them. At some point I had the chains in my hotel room and I had the sticks. I started making a head with the chain and filling the face up with the sticks. That’s how two more heads made their way into the museum.

Creating this work brought me full circle. I was in China, and it reminded me of my childhood. Art connects; it transcends cultures and boundaries, countries and nations.

Laurie: Tell me more about this exhibition.



Sigal: The whole series is called “Heads: The Voyage of Self-Discovery” and it is basically my personal, emotional journey through the past few years. I have been painting these heads; heads devoid of facial features… these very generic heads. I was using them as a mirror to look into myself. This journey enabled me to take a closer look at myself, but also to examine my interaction with the people surrounding me and with society as a whole.

Laurie: When you say your emotional journey and self-discovery, what did you find?

Sigal: I learned a lot. What I really wanted was to get to my core - what’s important to me, what drives and motivates me, who I am. I had made a huge transition in my life from the business world to art. I became really passionate about creating – painting and sculpting. For me it was a self-journey of following what I am passionate about... to create work that speaks to people and touches people, and I don’t think anything can compare with that feeling.

It’s about being true to yourself... it is about you and not about anyone else… you waking up in the morning, you going into the studio, you creating work.

I hope that when someone looks at the work they go through that same journey I went through in creating them. Those heads are mirrors, and they allow me to look into myself.

Laurie: So that is what the heads give us in a way, we can look at them as a mirror and have the chance to look inside more, and hopefully that journey of self-exploration will spark in ourselves?

Sigal: Yes. When you do abstract work you want someone to feel… I feel something when I create the paintings and I’m hoping that someone else gets something from them as well.

Laurie: Did something specific push you into this self-exploration?

Sigal: A few years ago one of my best friends passed away... when you look at the first few heads; they were about dealing with that loss and that despair… like a big part of your life gets yanked away and there’s that uncomfortable emptiness that you all of a sudden feel.

Then you go through the healing process and it takes a while before you feel comfortable with that empty space again. I think we are in a society that is not comfortable with the empty space of just being alone… you walk down the street and you are on your cell phone or you are on your iPod. We don’t walk down the street just with ourselves anymore; we don’t spend alone time. So I think part of that journey, part of the healing process, was becoming comfortable with being alone, with that empty space.



When you look at the background of that green head [Faces No. 2], it has a cement color – uncomfortable, unwelcoming. Much later on, when I became more comfortable with that void, you see the white background in that painting [Faces #3]. I finally got to a place where I felt... you know... he was watching over me and he is part of me, of my life.

Laurie: From that alone time did you then go back into the world differently?

Sigal: Very much so. I think experiences like that make us re-examine our lives. We should be happy in what we do … we should be true to who we are, and what we are doing, and the way we live our lives. We should do that not only during those times - when an external event forces us. I think we should do it everyday.



Laurie: The chains – you were concerned taking them into China, and you told me before that people have different interpretations… what do they mean to you?

Sigal: I started incorporating found objects, which let me explore my relationship with my surroundings. It let me bring my surroundings into my work. Chains have different connotations, but to me they express our emotional make-up – our ‘emotional DNA’.

Laurie: In the China exhibition you also showed, for the first time, a new project?

Sigal: Yes. ‘Living Monument’ is a project I’ve been working on for the past two years, collaborating with one of the top architecture firms in Mexico, Arditti + RDT. It is a 100-foot sculpture - the size of a ten-story building – based on a radiation mask [a device used during radiation treatment on cancer patients]. The idea was to take the mask and transform it into a human head. We wanted to give cancer a face. We want to tell everyone who’s fighting this disease that they are not alone, that we are all in this fight together.

Laurie: What kind of reactions did you get?

Sigal: People were really touched. During the opening ceremony of the exhibition, I found out that the person who heads the foundation that sponsored my exhibition was in the hospital and is fighting cancer. The people from the foundation were extremely moved by the work. I feel like the sculpture provided a sort of safe zone, where it was okay to talk about cancer and express feelings and emotions about it.

Laurie: Why did you take it from indoors to the outdoors?

Sigal: The percentage of the population that goes to a museum is small compared to the overall population. Placing the sculpture outdoors allows us to reach a broader audience.

We thought about the metaphor of the city with the freeways as its veins and arteries. We thought of placing the sculpture by the freeway as a way to integrate it into people’s everyday lives.

Laurie: So you originated this project. How did you get the people from the other disciplines involved?



Sigal: I approached the architects and they thought it was a great project for a great cause. I think that we all need to give back, and they feel the same way. We want to a make difference.

We are intersecting four disciplines that don’t very much intersect - art, architecture, health and education. Would the sculpture have come to this point without those other disciplines? No. It pushed me creatively.

Laurie: So you feel like this collaboration really helped with your creative process?

Sigal: I think that whether it’s China, here, or anywhere in the world, if you are open to the creative forces around you, and you’re willing to take yourself out of your comfort zone, it brings a whole new world of possibility. It takes your work to a different level - the work becomes more powerful and profound.


Laurie Lamson is a writer and filmmaker based in Los Angeles. She produces and directs mini-documentaries for neighborhoods, causes and organizations, and is currently raising funds to make a documentary about Edward Goldman’s Fine Art of Art Collecting classes. Learn more at www.jazzymae.com.


Replies: 15 Comments

on Saturday, September 6th, London Restaurants said

Hi

a really very interesting conversation about M.Bussel's art works.I have learned to know about her work area,her knowledge,professional power,imaginative arts,..etc.Really it is a nice post.

Regards
Gopal

on Saturday, August 16th, Robbert said

Californians in The Tate....

www.youtube.com/mindheist

on Friday, August 15th, Olga said

>The poor girl must have made enough dough on Wall >street to push up such a grandiose self-promotion >of nothing special

That's exactly what I was thinking about! To ship large paintings to China and pay all travel expenses...

on Tuesday, August 12th, josé said

couldn't get into the gopalooka site. agree wholeheartedly with Anya and Mark.

on Tuesday, August 12th, Andrew said

hmmm, seems what I got may mean something to somebody, because it was taken out.

on Tuesday, August 12th, Andrew said

Mark, when I clicked on GoPaLoOkA, I got I was being generous about the artwork since really it isn't my thing either. But it might be for somebody, didn't want to comment harshly just because it doesn't do anything for me. The blog is what I was commenting on.
Anya and Jomac, well, yes art should sstand on its own, without words to back it up, but as you said Mark, a blog is a kind of promotion, and shouldn't it do that job as well as it can? Two different things, yes, but words are very intertwined with our art, and should be the spice we cook our art with to let its savory aroma reach more people. Just my take, that's all, when I'm in my studio, all I'm thinking about is how to solve the visual problems as they come up.
The rich have as much right to produce art as anyone, and some of what they do is pretty good stuff. Tamara Lempicka comes to mind. But they avoided this kind of promotional train wreck.

on Monday, August 11th, Mark said

Anya, you have said it best so far.

on Monday, August 11th, Anya said

S. Bussel certainly has a great urge to speak out about something very important for her and, apparently, to the humankind too, about a Big 'C' or whatever, as it is claimed by the blog, well...

Her 'artistic' language is lacking in: 1. professional skill, 2. originality, - two basic and most important ingredients of what is acceptable as ART, sadly.

So, the only thing to support a bold claim that those handiworks are art, are: the sheer size of the stuff.

Still, if a person can draw a silhouette-profile of a human face poorly, then badly colour it in, blow it up, bend a steel mesh, etc., - it does not bring the whole sorry affair any closer to art, it stays where it came from, - in the realms of amateurish ambition to be an artist, just because one feel like?

The only western artist exhibiting with the Chinese ones in Beijing, hum? But there are many more of the amateurs where this came from, especially in China where all the 'museum quality oil paintings' for US $50 are flooding up the WWW space.

The poor girl must have made enough dough on Wall street to push up such a grandiose self-promotion of nothing special to see all the way to China, just, as it happens, in time for the Olympics, well done! A round of applause, everyone? I don't think so.

Talk-TALK-TALK-TALK-talk 'artsy' DOES NOT MAKE ART, never did, never will. Sad for Lamson and her friends but true. It should and it does take a lot more then a 'size matter' and a good chat to be considered an artist!

But, what is the message for us, poor mortals, who spent years learning to draw, paint, etc., and a life-time working quietly? Money talks, or, Blow It Up BIG - if it's big enough, it must be ART? Bull!

on Monday, August 11th, Mark said

I believe regardless of the type of art (abstract, representational or realism) it is always best to let the work stand on its own when possible. Trouble is some work can not stand on its own.

on Monday, August 11th, JOMAC said

The hardest thing for an abstract artist to do, IMO, is to attach words to his/her art. As soon as we do this, we limit the work. It's far better (when we can "afford" it), to let the viewer "feel" without
the artist's direction.

on Monday, August 11th, Mark said

Andrew, tho I agree with much of what you have said, I only said I did not feel as strongly about it as it seems you do. Nor was I expecting you to defend it. Why would I? Not my place.

I do disagree with you on one point, the work is as important or even more so then what has been said because that is what the basis for the blog is/should be about. The fact that the work (to me) seems uniteresting and suspect may be a reason for having to write the blog as it was. Something worthwhile will stand on its own and not need grand explanations. So the work is as important as the words.

As to the websites, I went to both, not deeply, but they seem to be legit.

Here to tho I believe you and I will be having this conversation with an empty chair, I doubt the writer of the blog nor the artist will be present.

on Monday, August 11th, Andrew said

Mark, it may be that most blogs are written to draw attention to the person the blog's about or who's writing it. Hopefully this is done by making an effort to be interesting and letting readers in on something that perhaps they never would have seen otherwise. But there's a streak of dishonesty, desperation maybe, that flashes when;
a.) the emphasis is on how great the person is
b.) the blog's agenda attempts to be hidden by using someone else as a front.
This is confirmed, or at least appears to be, when the single positive comment is made by a person using a fake web address, and using words like 'priviledged' and cliches about healing.
Since this is a site about artists, with a large participation by artists, it is helpful to the writer to be told frankly what feelings the blog arouses and why. We as artists want to be taken seriously, so when we put ourselves out there in front of an audience, we should want to be made aware of how we are being perceived. If it were me, I'd want to ask, 'what was it specifically that I said that drove you to this negative kind of response?'. My comments are an attempt to be sensitive and insightful about what I'm looking at, and to help foster improvement. Whether I am able to do that or not is a question of my own ability, and others' receptiveness to my ideas. I don't want to say the art is boring, because in the right context I really do believe it might have something to say. My comments are directed at the blog more than at the work it's about, because that's what needs attention first, in my opinion. The weakest link in the chain.

on Sunday, August 10th, Mark said

I didn't get out of this what Andrew did, at least not as overtly. But are not most blogs created to draw attention to the individual who is either writting the blog or whom the blog is about? Or both? I must say tho that the blog was not very interesting, nor was the work, at least what I saw. I often find suspect when an 'artist' just creates and recreates the same image over and over, even if it is done in different sizes and media. Repition is repition. My opinion.

on Saturday, August 9th, GoPaLoOkA said

Sigal's art expresses the ability to turn tragedies into learning experiences; accepting the darker side of life - learning to harness it - facilitating positive expression. I believe, this fosters healing and creates a connection with others.

Her privledged sensibilities came across in the article - hopefully future experiences ground her. It will be interesting to see how her art evolves.

on Friday, August 8th, Andrew said

There's something about this blog that disturbs me profoundly. It's not just the cliches, but a general feeling that Lamson and Segal are working together to promote the artist's work using 'per bennismo' as they say in Italy, or a total positivity unmitigated by whatever negatives are present. Kind of like skipping down the street singing, with a smile on, and ignoring the sometimes frightful realities right there alongside of you. There's the repeated reference to 'large' works, to 'successful', to a 'top' firm, etc. which kind of reduce the clearly meaningful content of the artworks themselves through self agrandisement. I would have liked this interview a lot better, and been more drawn to the artist and her work, if there were a bit less of that.

 

Signup for your own Art Blog and Artist Portfolio

Artblogs
Archives
RSS Feed

Read the absolutearts blog at these sites:
absolutearts.blogspot.com
absoluteartscom.wordpress.com
blog.myspace.com/absolutearts
absolutearts.livejournal.com
absolutearts.spaces.live.com

wwar.com
absolutearts.com

Current Artist Blogs:
Catherine Foster:  Have you ever wanted to earn residual income from your Art?
Mt Mcclanahan:  A Grandchild's Perspective
Rochelle Carr:  Fine Art Giveaway in exchange for Follow Your Heart Poetry Book Purchase and Reviews.
Leni Kae:  Libra: This Month's Astrology Artwork
Adrian Setterfield:  the Assumption of Perspective Part 2
Dr. Gerd Matysik:  Artmatysik's artists Bertram & Dr. Gerd Matysik invited to participate in UKRAINIAN ART WEEK KIEV
Melody Phaneuf:  Calling at Boston International Fine Art Show, Nov 12-15
Walter King:  Recreated works lost in Argentina Nov. 19th
Stephen Mead:  First 4 Star Review for "Our Book of Common Faith"
Donna Bernstein:   CELEBRATION OF FINE ART, SCOTTSDALE AZ
Theo. Dapore:  Absolute Arts artist Theo Dapore's website moves up in Google ratings
Hooshang Khorasani:  Hooshang participates in Holiday Arts Tour
Jim Lively:  Aerial View
Debbi Chan:  consumed by art
Sebastian Burckhardt:  Renewal of Arts
Natalia Oneill:  Musings on Paintings

August 2008
SMTWTFS
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31