login   password  artist portfolio  gallery portfolio  MYabsolutearts 
absolutearts.com
 
  NEWEST TRENDS |AMP| nbsp; help   |  media kit   |  about us   |  services   |  contact  
  NEWEST TRENDS .         SEARCH   .   BUY   .   JOIN   .   COLLECT   .   RESEARCH   .   READ  .   DISCUSS  

Art Blogs - Artblogs - Art Weblogs - absolutearts.com - wwar.com

 
Home » Archives » December 2007 » The Sad Tale of the Sydney Museum of Contemporary Art

[Previous entry: "Mr. Speivolgel"] [Next entry: "The New Art Year"]

12/27/2007: "The Sad Tale of the Sydney Museum of Contemporary Art" by Nicholas Forrest


The Museum of Contemporary Art, in my home town of Sydney, Australia, is located at one of the most beautiful and spectacular spots in Sydney on the edge of the beautiful Sydney harbour at Circular Quay, adjacent to the historic Rocks precinct. As Australia's only museum dedicated to exhibiting, interpreting and collecting contemporary art from across Australia and around the world, the MCA is an extremely important institution for the promotion and presentation of contemporary art in Australia. From the description above you could be forgiven for picturing the MCA institution as a triumphant expression of contemporary art practise that reflects the experimental and cutting edge nature of the art that they exhibit. But unfortunately, this is not the case. What should be a highly successful contemporary exhibition space is instead an under-achieving, awkward and problematic museum that seems to be doomed to a life of being ignored and passed by, regardless of how good the exhibitions are.



From the outset the museum struggled to make ends meet resulting in a major review and restructure in 1999 when the museum faced the prospect of being closed permanently due to a lack of funds but thankfully the corporate sector came to the rescue providing enough funds to keep the gallery open. The problem with the corporate backing is the criticisim that the gallery continues to receive for what many people perceive as a public, cutural institution being manipulated and guided by various commercial and corporate entities. One of the more positive changes which came about as a result of the review and the subsequent corporate sponsorship was the scrapping of the entry fee which, although minimal, was a major factor in the low attendance figures. Although we like to think that modern society is open minded and progressive enough to embrace and appreciate the diversity and experimental nature of contemporary art, the fact remains that an exhibition of old masters is still going to be far more popular than an exhibition of contemporary art. With the option to see a gallery of old masters for free at the nearby Art Gallery of New South Wales there would never be any contest while the MCA was charging an entry fee.

The biggest problem with the MCA is quite obviously the building itself, which is an art deco style stone structure that was constructed between 1939 and 1949 to house the offices of the Maritime Services Board who occupied the building until 1989 when they moved to larger premises. At around the same time the newly created MCA needed a home so the New South Wales Government gifted the former MSB building to the MCA who undertook a restoration and refurbishment of the building before the grand opening in 1991. Even after the refurbishment of the interior the space feels cramped, confined and dinghy, which combined with the confusing layout creates an atmosphere that not only evokes feelings of gloom and displeasure but is also detrimental to the art being exhibited

If you regularly visit museums and galleries then you will be aware that the space in which art is exhibited has a major impact on the way people experience and interact with the art. so one would expect that a contemporary exhibition space would have a building that reflects and complements the modern, progressive and experimental nature of the art being exhibited. In 2002 the MCA held a competition to redesign the museum which should have resulted in the current building being demolished to make way for a specially designed modern space but that irrational fear of the new and different reared its ugly head resulting in enough opposition to the demolition of the existing building to prevent the rebuild going ahead. With a tarnished reputation and several blatantly obvious defects I cannot understand why the museum has not found another premises and undergone a well overdue make-over but then again some people will insist on flogging a dead horse no matter how silly they look. Having said all that I regularly visit the MCA because of the amazing exhibitions that they have so I would still encourage people to visit the museum regardless of it's flaws.

Replies: 8 Comments

on Friday, January 4th, Ross Barber said

The MCA is a gorgeous representative building of its time, but the refurbishment was a dismal exercise. Yet I am very happy it is there and go there whenever in Sydney.

However I think Nicholas Forrest and other writers on the subject are missing the vital point by trying to improve the presentational apparatus, in as much that the spending of squillions on a new 'contemporary' presentation space is one dimensional and would not solve the problem.
Firstly all buildings become dated. Second Australians in general contemporaneously do not have any interest nor have they historically had any interest in contemporary art except as a butt of jokes or media hyperbole on the excesses of artists and arts organizations financial waste and that is the actual nub of the problem. With the lack of what I might term a liberal education in the country and the focus on single stream i.e. business degrees not much will change except as Pierre Bourdieu wrote that a rising commercial class wished to take on the cultural trappings of their masters the Aristocratic class.
Personally I 'believe' I can usually see the art beyond its presentational apparatus although I have written in other places of my deep concern that I have been socially, educationally, ideologically in the Mannheim sense set up in my reception of a NAME work of art.
So reflecting on another artist and his work of what was then very now contemporary time. If Blue Poles (forgive the cliché but we all know the story of its purchase by the Whitlam government for the National gallery) was sitting in someone’s studio/shed would you or I recognize it as a work of art in its singularity without all the underpinning apparatus including the very very expensive lighting?
Ross Barber
Centenary of Federation Medal for Distinguished Service to the Arts

on Monday, December 31st, Nicholas Forrest said

There is definitely considerable support for artist's in Australia but not as much as there should be. I suppose one's opinion of a gallery depends on what they are comparing it to. Having seem some of the world's best exhibition spaces my standards are quite high. The MCA is a fantastic institution and does good work but it could be so much better if it had a more appropriate gallery space.

on Sunday, December 30th, jose said

I visited the MCA in 2004 on a trip from my home-base in Brunei at the time. I guess I didn't spot the limitations you mention because I was thrilled to be visiting your country and pleased to finaly come upon something housing Art after years of living in a cultural no-man's-land [though there were other attractions]. I was struck by how much support there seemed to be for artists in Oz, or was this again just a warped view I got due to my cultural deficit at the time?

on Saturday, December 29th, nicholas forrest said

I agree that $20 is a bit steep for entry to the MOMA but it is one of the best modern art galleries in the world. I wouldn't want to be paying any extra for entry into exhibitions though.

on Friday, December 28th, walt said

However, I probably would never pay the new $20 entrance fee to MoMA since I've seen much of their collection over the years. Maybe for something really special. I love contemporary and Modern work but that price is getting to be outside the realm of reality. If I didn't have a friend on the inside I'd have never set foot in the new building.

on Friday, December 28th, Ellen said

The Tate is gorgeous!

on Friday, December 28th, theboyracer2@hotmail.com">Nicholas Forrest said

I think that one of the best examples of a building that is condusive to the appreciation of the art is the Tate Modern building which is an epic space that complements the art on display perfectly

on Thursday, December 27th, Ellen said

Regardless of my previous extolling of holding fast to the "old," in this instance I am in complete agreement with you, Nicholas. I think that MOMA in NY is a great example of showcasing contemporary art in a building condusive to appreciating the art to its utmost. Hopefully, the MCA will get the funding & face lift it needs.