login   password  artist portfolio  gallery portfolio  MYabsolutearts 
absolutearts.com
 
  NEWEST TRENDS |AMP| nbsp; help   |  media kit   |  about us   |  services   |  contact  
  NEWEST TRENDS .         SEARCH   .   BUY   .   JOIN   .   COLLECT   .   RESEARCH   .   READ  .   DISCUSS  

Art Blogs - Artblogs - Art Weblogs - absolutearts.com - wwar.com

 
Home » Archives » February 2006 » Tradeshow Changes

[Previous entry: "A National Gallery, a Dutchman called Rembrandt and HIGHLIGHTS..."] [Next entry: "DILEMMA"]

02/28/2006: "Tradeshow Changes" by Barney Davey


With the March 3-5 weekend upon us, it is a good time to talk about tradeshows. This year, the 28th annual ArtExpo will be held at the Jacob Javits Center in Manhattan. ArtExpo remains the largest and most prestigious art tradeshow in the U.S. and arguably the world. It is actually a tradeshow and a consumer show with the first two days, Thursday and Friday, open to the trade only.

Tradeshows have been a mainstay in the arsenal of marketers seeking to get art prints to market. They have been and stay among the most viable means for artists and art publishers to gain awareness and sales. Since tradeshows are a dynamic that continually morphs with changes affect artists and publishers, marketers must be able to keep pace with the changes as they occur.

The past decade has wrought major changes that continue to roil the industry. First, there was the demise of the Professional Picture Framers Association (PPFA) shows. The PPFA was always a small, but important trade organization. Like many small organizations, it suffered from a lack on continuous leadership. New presidents came too often to allow it to make good long-term decisions, especially those that concerned mounting a viable tradeshow that met the needs of all its constituents and its core mission of education.

More importantly, was the rise of importance of the Decor shows for the art industry in both New York and Atlanta. Decor Expo managed to knock out the PPFA shows and at the same time wrest away from ArtExpo a huge chunk of business that only wanted to participate in the trade side of ArtExpo’s events. Meanwhile, the Atlanta show grew from a solidly successful show with 350 booths to nearly 2,000 booths at its zenith.

ArtExpo in the meantime was known for starting more shows that never got off the ground than for anything else. Nonetheless, its New York has managed to hang on to its prestige and many of its customers. ArtExpo has changed its focus to concentrate on bigger and fewer shows. In recent years it has successfully launched a SOLO show allowing single artists without representation to display original works. This year, it announced a new “Show within a Show” called Pavilion. It will highlight original works from 20 high-end galleries.

An example of the abovementioned dynamic is a group of top ArtExpo exhibitors who were unhappy with the show management succeeded with the startup the Fine Art Forum. It runs concurrent with ArtExpo. ArtExpo after years of poor results finally stopped trying to produce a West Coast show. Forays into Northern California and Las Vegas were busts and led to management giving up on the West Coast. This is indicative of how difficult it is to start and grow a successful tradeshow anywhere.

Decor Expo had its troubles on the West Coast as well. As a show with buyers who were daytrippers as opposed to the prized buyers who spend the night, it was unable to maintain its favorable January dates in Long Beach. This created an opening for Picture Framing Magazine (PFM) to step into the show business with its West Coast Art & Frame (WCAF) show in January in Las Vegas.

Many observers gave this show with its mid-week dates and early January schedule no chance to compete. Not too mention that Vegas is known to be a tradeshow killer. Great for conventions, lousy for tradeshows, especially smaller ones was the rap…too much competition for buyers’ attention. The hotels are not inclined to give room rates on weekends in Vegas, making it a tough climate to produce a successful new show.

Undaunted, PFM took its shot and when it saw attendance flat, it added a hefty education component which saved the day. This is an interesting development because education was the problem with PPFA shows. If a buyer is pulled from the show floor to learn something, that can turn down the din on the floor and deaden the experience for the exhibitors. Surprisingly, PFM managed to pull together against the odds and create a continuing evolving show that has gotten better each of the 5 or 6 years of its existence. This against a backdrop of Decor Expo’s new owners killing off its regional shows during the same time.

Decor Expo’s management decided to put its focus on bigger shows and to quit producing the more marginally profitable regional shows. With a debt load to manage from the purchase, such things needed to be carefully considered along with changes in the market. Its management drove to tremendous success in Atlanta. At its high point, the Decor Expo Atlanta show ranked among the largest 200 shows in the U.S. This was quite a feat considering there are literally tens of thousands of shows put on around the country annually.

Unfortunately, the show has not been able to maintain that high booth count. There is buyer-to-exhibitor ratio that shows must maintain to continue to deliver value for exhibitors. The Atlanta show grew to the point of that ratio getting out of favorable numbers and booth sales declined. Granted, the cancellation of the show slated for September 14, 2001 put a major hurt on things, but it is not the primary reason for the decline. It has more to do with the size of the industry and the buyer pool available to attend the show.

There has been a change in the buyer component as well. While all the important art tradeshows, Decor Expos in particular, grew by servicing the small independent retailer; it became harder to use that model as big box retailers such as Bed, Bath & Beyond, Target and Internet retailers like Art.com made huge inroads into the business. The volume of business these operations produced changed the focus of the art publishers and increasingly crowded out independent retailers.

A new show, The Art & Framing Showplace, launched in New York in October 2005, but it was unable to attract enough exhibitors and buyers. Even with its close ties to tradeshow powerhouse, George Little Management (producer of the New York Gift Show and dozens of other top producing shows), it is not likely to continue. The producers had tried a year earlier and cancelled before it began. You only get a couple of chances, if that, to put on a new show. The odds are equal to starting a successful sitcom these days. I just read that Hollywood actress Heather Graham’s new show, (I don’t remember the name, see the problem), cancelled after one episode. That is brutal.

Where does all this leave things today? To start, the New York Decor Expo is withering on the vine. Its 2005 show had many problems and was very costly for exhibitors. The net result is wave of decades long exhibitors at this show have dropped out or reduced to a couple of booths. There are about 100 exhibitors listed on the Decor Expo Website floor plan. Compared to nearly 1,000 booths and hundreds of companies with a waiting list just a few years ago, this is a tragedy for everyone involved. Regardless, this show has lost the most important thing a show has…that is momentum. Once exhibitors begin to lose confidence, a show is on shaky ground. When the very high costs of showing in New York are included and the changing nature of distribution are factored, it makes the decision to quit the show easier.

Another problem is that art publishers now sample all their best buyers before a show. They can’t afford to have an important buyer come to the booth to find new pieces. That would be the kiss of death. So, instead of being an order writing show, or at least place to find new buyers with potential, the show has become more of a place to fly the flag and to PR with buyers. After threatening for years, art publishers have just jumped ship on Decor Expo New York.

Meanwhile, the ArtExpo component seems to be holding its own, if not growing some. That bodes well for the middle part of the market. But, the great promise of bringing the Decor Expo shows from the ill-suited Passenger Ship Piers on the West Side Highway to the Jacob Javits Center to be together and concurrent with ArtExpo has apparently not worked out the way anyone involved could have imagined, or certainly wanted.

The WCAF show continues to grow, but it is constrained in that it has another 50 booths before it hits a waiting list. The show producers are very aware of the buyer-to-exhibitor ratio are not inclined to sell more booths just because they can. This is in part why the show has grown each year. The producers are being rewarded for showing restraint.
I found exhibitors at this year’s show to be in general happy to be there and happy with show management. You can’t ask for much more than that.

Where does this leave you? If you are thinking of tradeshows, Decor Expo New York may no longer be your best bet. However, ArtExpo New York still shows vibrancy. The WCAF show is looking more promising for open edition publishers and some limited edition publishers. There were some higher priced sculptures and prints this year that the show has not seen before.

It will be interesting to see how the Decor Expo Atlanta show fares this year. ArtExpo is not returning after a two-year run of lackluster results for exhibitors in that venue. Bottom line, for veteran companies and new exhibitors is more careful consideration than ever about which shows to attend and at what level of exhibition (how many booths) needs to be given than ever.

Pfingsten Partners LLC, which owns Pfingsten Publishing LLC is rumored to have the company up for sale. When it bought Decor Expo and Decor magazine and other properties in 1999, its long-range plan was to sell within seven years. This year marks the end of that range, so a sale is a good possibility assuming a viable buyer steps up with the right price and financing. Undoubtedly, new ownership will make changes. The industry needs strong leadership in show producers and media companies. Let’s wish for the best outcome for all the people who make their living in the art and framing industry.

Replies: 6 Comments

on Friday, March 3rd, Barney said

Hyacinthe,

No one has asked that before. I thought the term art print marketing consultant would be self-evident. If you are truly keen to know, my Website elaborates on how I help artists get their work to the print market.

on Thursday, March 2nd, Hyacinthe Baron said

What exactly is an "art print marketing consultant"?

on Thursday, March 2nd, elaniii@yahoo.com">Andrew said

Barney, I have to add something that I think addresses the point brought up by Jose. Trade shows charge a lot for a limited amount of time. Pretty much only those in the volume sales business can afford booths, although I have seen cases of artists themselves renting spaces. Since the organizers know that most of their customers are going to be dealers, that's who they focus on in terms of fulfilling people's needs. I participated in ArtExpo in New York and San Francisco with a gallery, and saw first hand that the biggest players have the most booth space, simply because they can afford it. Not many artists can afford to compete in this arena, and they would do better to try in a setting that gives value to the human aspect of their creations rather than its cash valuation. That is, unless you're Peter Max, who is in himself an industry.

on Thursday, March 2nd, jose freitas cruz said

Barney, rereading my comment to you I realize I may have passed on the idea that I would do away with tradeshows altogether and revert to some sort of primitive system that would take us back into the dark ages. This, of course, is not what I would like to see happening, tradeshows are [or should be] as important a tool for artists as they are for galleries and collectors. What I would like to see is the coming into being of a tradeshow where the creators of works of art would feel as welcome as those coming in to sell or buy.

Art is a commodity, there is no getting around that one, but having said that, the industry handles it in such a manner that all too often leaves its originator at a loss, and it seems to me that not much effort or thought is made to try to redress that situation.

I agree and hope with you that new leadership shows up, someone with a new outlook on the whole situation and with new ideas to help bridge the gap between the creators of the commodity and the ones who would reap the benefits beyond the love we put into our creations. Someone who might truly bring about a framework that provides the best outcome for all the people who make their living in the art and framing industry as you mention in your blog.

on Wednesday, March 1st, Barney Davey said

Hi Jose,
Thanks for your thoughts on my blog. To clear up my position, I am an author, speaker and an art print marketing consultant.

I'm not sure about collectors being weary. This post is about tradeshows where, ArtExpo's consumer component aside, collectors are not typically involved. The consumer side, including ArtExpo, continues to show vibrancy. Earlier reports on blogs here and elsewhere spoke of how successful the Art Basel Miami and Palm Beach Art Shows were.

It is "art" season where I live in Arizona now. There are huge month plus long white tent shows running concurrent and strong weekend shows being staged in and around Scottsdale. All with higher priced art. Much of it originals and beyond the average price one might encounter at ArtExpo, which is still a show of multiples. That is, you'll find at ArtExpo theh ratio of giclees and such to originals to be very high.

I am not so sure that the industry is tired of tradeshows, it seems to me that the industry is tired of the constant changes brought about by changing market dynamics and changes wrought by show management. The cost of participating in tradeshows has escalated dramatically in recent years, while, unfortunately, prices have been relatively flat.

Your point about less artificialness is spot on. I believe there is a trend towards authenticity in our society. American Idol, the televsion show here in the U.S. has become a phenomenon of gargantuan proportions. It soundly beat the Grammys last week be nearly double in audience size. This despite the likes of U2, Mariah Carey, Coldplay, Kanye West, Paul McCartney and many more top drawer acts.

Many reading that last statement might turn up their nose at the thought of American Idol from any perspective, but the trend remains that there is more interest in watching unknown hopefuls singing their hearts out for a shot at glory than there is for trumped up, hyped up superstars.

This notion of mine about the yearning for authenticity may perhaps be a thin slice of insight as thin sliced is described in Malcolm Gladwell's bestselling book, Blink. A recommended terrific easy read.

Jose, I commend you for your optimism. May you always keep it. Keep it and remain true to your own principles. I believe an artist can have great success without having to sell his or her soul to do so. Success without dignity is a sad thing. Success with it intact is a glorious thing.

on Wednesday, March 1st, jose freitas cruz said

Barney, I’m going to go out on a limb here but I wouldn’t want you to read what I am about to say as an affront but rather as the view some artists have regarding the ‘industry’ as you have just described it.

From your posts I still haven’t unearthed whether you are an artist going to these trade fairs because your work is being promoted there, or someone who helps to promote the work of other artists. If the former, I congratulate you for being up there with what some may judge to be the cream of the crop – and I can appreciate your concern at the current trend the market is revealing; if the latter I applaud your initiatives to help others show and sell their work and understand, perhaps even more, the fears you express regarding the future of the ‘industry’.

As an artist my main concern is that it has become an industry, or rather, that our work has given rise to an industry. Inevitable, you will say, and I might even agree. But I have chosen to swim against the tide, and as inevitable as it may seem I still find enough space to swim where the currents aren’t so strong.

Reading your very interesting post I get the idea that collectors and potential buyers on your side of the Atlantic are slowly growing tired of the amount of trade-fairs they have to keep up with and aren’t having as much fun hunting for art as they did when the phenomena first appeared. The same thing seems to be happening on this side.

I do understand that this new industry has to keep itself alive – and I do know from experience that we artists are always chastised for even suggesting that there is significantly little we get in return – but I have to state here, for the record, that I view this state of things with optimism in that it may signify a shift of the balance in the artist’s favour [even though this may not yet be perceived or accepted by many].

Art dealers and galleries are sometimes bewildered when I ask them if they don’t think it would be wiser to scale things down a bit. Bring things back to a more humane dimension – less art-ificial, less distant, not so lofty. This, obviously, has shut me many doors but I would rather collaborate with partners who are ready to accept me on an equal basis. Fortunately there still are a few to be found, and I have a strong feeling that in a few years time their numbers will grow, out of necessity, because we are the ones who bring the goods to the market.

My optimism lies in that even though sales have plummeted in the past years my rapport with collectors and potential buyers has grown, out of the practice I have spoken of in comments to these blogs of maintaining a more meaningful presence within my community. It takes longer, sales are perhaps fewer at the start, but once you gather momentum the growth that ensues is yours and yours alone, and you [as an artist] stay in command.

But then again, this is just the view point of one artist.