login   password  artist portfolio  gallery portfolio  MYabsolutearts 
absolutearts.com
 
  NEWEST TRENDS |AMP| nbsp; help   |  media kit   |  about us   |  services   |  contact  
  NEWEST TRENDS .         SEARCH   .   BUY   .   JOIN   .   COLLECT   .   RESEARCH   .   READ  .   DISCUSS  

Art Blogs - Artblogs - Art Weblogs - absolutearts.com - wwar.com

 
Home » Archives » December 2005 » THE GAME OF ART FOR 2006

[Previous entry: "HATSHEPSUT"] [Next entry: "December Travel Tips"]

12/26/2005: "THE GAME OF ART FOR 2006" by Hyacinthe Baron


It is the Holiday Season again and "The times they are a changing", Bob Dylan said it quite appropriately. Art has become a game and the players are bigger than ever. An Art Elite definitely exists. Entrepreneurs and business men like the Rizzos of Barnes and Noble have inherited the boards of institutions from the old wealthy who played the art game for tax breaks and to become Art Patrons to those few artistes who knew how to play the game. New actions are required for an artist to make it today. The number of artists has grown by leaps and bounds. Artists who do not understand their craft find it difficult to discern what is good art and what is not because they are not being taught reverence for art and craft as the old masters did. They do not apprentice in the studios of master artists or seek the right teachers. They put raw pencil to paper and think that is enough. And why not? They are being told that a childlike drawing by a drugged out Basqiuat has great value. Talent is not a necessary to be a successful artist in the world today.




Cycles: Oil on canvas, 3'x4' Hyacinthe Kuller Baron

To me, self taught but educated by looking at and studying the works of early Medieval and Renaissance masters, the discernment came from instinct, intuition and being in touch with an inner aesthetic. I wonder then why so many individuals disregard these basic ingredients and actually wonder if a terribly rendered drawing or painting actually might have value?

In the game of art there are so many childlike scrawls being touted as great works of art and value we search for a hint that may show promise of talent or an ability to someday present a new vision and a new technique, only to fall back on our proverbial bottom at the recognition of the truth that so much art being put out there actually has a rank odor. It is like the Emperor’s New Clothes. Artists playing the game keep hoping maybe, just maybe, without their knowing it, some arbiter of taste with money to dispense will come upon their work and make a declaration. Then the artist will reap the true rewards for putting pencil to paper for declaring their ego like Kilroy, "I was here!" "I made this!" Isn't it not only wonderful but in the art game it has a value! Yippeee!

I look for evidence of a path traveled by the artist to arrive at a self determined level of excellence. There is enough history of the works of great artists so it is not a guessing game after all. It all makes me wonder; could a train run on non-existent tracks? Could a shooter hit a target every time without training? Could an untrained opera singer be catapulted to a stage and praised for a raw performance? Would that singer be acclaimed for a valid interpretation of a great composers work? I think not.

So who is in charge and by what aesthetic value judgments are marks made without refinement and technique being declared worthy of appreciation?


Life and Death: Oil on canvas, 2'x3' Hyacinthe Kuller Baron

These are things to be contemplated by the artist in serious pursuit of an artistic ideal and the subsequent rewards that accompany such strivings. The reality is that most fine artists do achieve a modicum of success through recognition and rewards in the arenas in which they choose to compete. There are always venues available for the accomplished artist to find acclaim.

Today the state of the arts and patronage are totally different from the way it used to be. A collector simply cannot donate a work or works of art without a matching purchase fund. This is because several years ago the government put an end to the "Tax Game" which had been going on for years between collector donors and Museums. I assisted one of the world's greatest designers and my mentor Charles James in locating his creations from among the collections of the intelligentsia of the world. They would donate their James original to a museum collection such as the Metropolitan Museum Costume Collection or the Alfred and Victoria Museum in London, and subsequently receive a huge tax write off and then give the designer a check as a stipend for him to live off his "laurels" as it were.
Many of the great designers such as Fortuny and Madame Vionnet and Matisse and Giacometti and other artists and even writers practiced this sort of patronage and made their living this way. This is not too different from the patronage Michelangelo and DaVinci and other great masters received. There are artists today who maintain the skill to play the artist and sponsor game, the mentor and protege relationship exists as we know.


Women of Fashion, Oil and metallics on canvas, 2'x3' by Hyacinthe Kuller Baron
I know a sculptor who practiced this art for many years, by charming noble women of wealth and movie stars, gracing their collections with his work, using their names to parlay others to obtain pieces, without payment, donating them to museums for certain values and he receiving his stipend from their windfall benefits. In return he wined and dined the wealthy and famous in his humble abode sans studio to which they flocked for the charm of it all and the "in" invitation to the Bohemian life style. The rest of the time he served as Artist in Residence at luxurious estates where he assumed the role of Culture Rep and was given a broad canvas on which to practice his wiles and find new benefactors.
It was quite a game.

However it all ended when the government revised the tax laws and declared only the value of the materials would apply to any donated work.
What was a poor investor collector to do?
Remand the artists back to their garrets to drown in the increasing sea of works they were producing under now false pretenses? The game was done. The monies dried up. The Galleries were aware the audience had too so why waste valuable space.


Dogs of War: Mixed Media on Canvas: Dedicated to 9/11, 3'x4' by Hyacinthe Kuller Baron


Enter a new player in the art market: the art print reproduction, unlimited, unsigned, unnumbered and affordable with a big profit margin in the framing, a cross between the decorative and the master art. A Picasso for every living room and the funds and the original go to museums to add to their purchase awards so they could build their collections and reward the donors with real money. It gets so complicated it is almost the stuff of myth.
Did we think Dali was nuts? Or was he aware of the market conditions and willing to put on a show for the end result of increasing the interest in and the value of his works? There was a reason he only accepted payment in gold from "dealers", he didn't trust them and their promises for all the tea in China. And think about it. Dali was a great draftsman, a marvelous painter who commanded his medium and look at what he had to resort to. In the end he sold out to Disney, trying desperately to make the leap into 3 dimensions with laser art which Disney would later perfect without Dali.
Talk about plagiarism. Thousands of full color large scale art books with pages torn out and phony signatures impressed and sold in fancy frames by unscrupulous art dealers cashing in on a growing market of collectors who like to follow the crowd and could be convinced that after all, if it is a Dali, it must have great worth. Dealers went to jail and right back to their old ways as soon as they were let out. Another glitzy gallery and plenty more prints where those came from.

That is the thing about art books that feature collections of works by artists. Books can be printed in the thousands. They can be circulated in so many varied venues and the work therein seen by so many varied individuals. It is a wonder to me why every artist wouldn't want to seize an opportunity to have their work appear in a book dedicated to showcasing selected art and the artist, and protecting the imagery by being published in black and white and then backed up to boot by a showcase on an internet web site in full color.
The art game is no longer the same as it was before Warhol and Basquiat. The ballrooms are closed in the great mansions. Mrs. William Randolph Hearst no longer poses in her Charles James Original ballgown for ads in Vogue Magazine, Mrs DeHeeron of the Wanamaker fortune no longer subsidizes starving artists and designers and somewhere she has the one size fits all original dress Charlie gave me and then borrowed back so he could give it to her and receive another check for her tax benefit donation.

So how does this apply to artists today? It is a new game. Artists who are ready to exhibit, who honestly feel they have reached a level on which their talent describes the artistic journey and arrival should now take advantage of the opportunities that do exist. Post works in a portfolio site on the internet which is a personal space and an opportunity for the artist to display and set the stage for the presentation of their art.

Enter competitions and then list them in biographies whether won or not, effort does count. Constantly build credits to impress potential collectors and benefactors that the artist has a history of exhibiting.

Publish art for archival purposes in books like the Art and Human Nature Collection Literary and Art Book which benefits the many projects of the Baron Conservancy. Publication is March 2006. Check it out on www.barongallery.com. Potential buyers are always impressed when they see the artist’s work published and can have a book in hand.

These things will add to the artist's curriculum vitae when approaching galleries and future collectors and benefactors and museums.

We look forward to the most successful art new year ever. It is 80 degrees in Palm Springs, CA and 70 at the Baron Conservancy in Wonder Valley. We will drink a toast to all and would like to invite all artists to contribute to our book and attend our book signing

We have decided, at this late stage in our art game, to develop our own venue and to create a master work that will belong to the land. The Baron Conservancy is conceived as an earthscape, an original work in progress that will grow through the contributions of many artistic spirits who participate in the events we have planned and who partake in the planned art activities, and share the AWE during our Art Workshop Experiences. And everyone is invited. Visit us at www.barongallery.com. Happy New Year.


Replies: 31 Comments

on Tuesday, January 3rd, dianne bowen said

Art is a passion. If you have it, you will create it, study it, investigate it love it and hate it.
I believe in the old saying, "you can't make an abstract painting of a house until you know how to paint a house."
This is a simple statemnt about some complex issues being brought but sometimes less is more. This has been a good topic, a good conversation is always appreciated.

on Sunday, January 1st, Athena said

Bravo Hyacinthe Baron! I think your blog truly did the "job" you intended; I have been an art teacher for years and rarely do I find any relavent material on the topic of "making it in the art world" for my young adult students to analyze and think about in the modern art world that provokes so much thought, passion, and feeling in making well informed choices and/or opinions. Even the argumentative comments on your writing will help facilitate wonderful dialogue concerning the age old gripe of creation vs. success! As for my opinion of this all, if anyone really cares that is, I think hearing the intensity with which each person responded, whether we agree with them or not, tells us that art and the thinking of art is alive and that makes me very pleased! The view points expressed are all topics that have gone round and round in my head like a hamster on his exercise wheel. Moving fast and furiously but going no where. What I have come up with for my own sanity is: to create when I can and what I enjoy and if that means in the process that I make some money or become a little more well-known all the better for it, if not, then I at least enjoyed the process and the experience and not enough people that I have met or talked with truly take the time to enjoy the journey. Finally, I don't think it will help any of us to compare ourselves or our work to artists of the past. Fine Artists today have so many more deterants (increased technological advances etc.), that to try and compete against the "masters" and their legacies (well-earned or not) is only perpetuating negativity and setting all modern day artists up for failure. Thank you Ms. Baron for your insightful, truthful and thought provoking writing, I for one appreciated it!

on Friday, December 30th, Matt Beall said

Hi all--- I posted this earlier but neglected to include my name.

Wow, such interesting comments! Some of them have hit the nail on the head and some have gone in a direction that I don't think even the writer knows where he/she is going.

It's plain to see that ART is highly subjective i.e. the viewer reserves the right to see it whichever way he/she chooses regardless of education (whatever education that may be). What is good art to one is bad art to another and so on. Read: subjective

The business of art has (most likely)always been a game... the only thing that has changed is the time in which the business is done. The bottom line is you have to participate in the game if you want to make it just as Hyacinthe does.

on Friday, December 30th, Matt Beall said

Hi all--- I posted this earlier but neglected to include my name.

Wow, such interesting comments! Some of them have hit the nail on the head and some have gone in a direction that I don't think even the writer knows where he/she is going.

It's plain to see that ART is highly subjective i.e. the viewer reserves the right to see it whichever way he/she chooses regardless of education (whatever education that may be). What is good art to one is bad art to another and so on. Read: subjective

The business of art has (most likely)always been a game... the only thing that has changed is the time in which the business is done. The bottom line is you have to participate in the game if you want to make it just as Hyacinthe does.

on Friday, December 30th, jcrispin@runbox.com">John C Wilson said

I think artists can be naive to the business of selling, because it calls for a mind set that relies on role-playing. It's the same for musicians and actors, I guess. I've seen how some well-heeled people perpetuate success, and believe me, it's fantastic. You can invent your resume, in fact do as much as possible to detach yourself - from yourself! Perhaps not what a "dedicated" artist, would approve of. By that, I mean someone who's satisfaction comes from within, and not from the reflection mirrored by an alter-ego. It's O.K. to be fake if you're the one with the wallet, but there's no faking art - unless you're a crook! So the "game" will always be. A little off-track, but I remember a music band some 15 years ago, who were played incessantly on national radio at a time when I was managing a band. Well they were awful, and a pale imitation of the style of music that was being pumped out in the local venues. Well it turned out that the lead singer was the son of England's top law lord at the time, so there you have it. They even got to re-release their first, and only album for a second time, a year or so later, after lasting only a few months on national radio. Some justice.

on Friday, December 30th, Dianne Bowen said

Throwing quotes like daggers, a bit of a temper going on here. The "game" of art has always been around like an evolving animal. It would be niave to think that art is different from any other creative or social passion. Hence the flaring tempers, the frustrations, disappointments and most wonderful of all the sheer determination. An artist creates from their soul because that's what they do plain and simple. I'm sure all artists would love to make a living doing their work. But the business side of art is the "Game" and it is necessary to figure it out. After all art is a relative opinion, in the eye of the beholder, sorry for the cliche'.

on Friday, December 30th, albonet@4email.net">Alan Bonet said

Well Andrew, that puts a face to the comments, and your work certainly has flair. I can't say that I have any artistic talent, but if I did, then like your fellow artists who've commented on this blog, I wouldn't waste my breath replying either. Good luck.

on Friday, December 30th, elaniii@yahoo.com">Andrew Wielawski said

These are easily available for anyone who read my initial post in this thread, goes to one of my blogs, or to a third place, my web page on absolutearts, www.absolutearts.com/portfolios/e/elaniii

on Friday, December 30th, albonet@4email.net">Alan bonet said

How come you figure so overwhelmingly and willingly on this comments page, "Gloves off & masks too" as you put it? I notice that the majority of people leaving comments on the author's blog have the courtesy to leave their surname as well as their email address. It's a sign of trust, and puts people at ease. You're obviously not secure speaking your mind.

on Friday, December 30th, Andrew said

Dear Josefina's husband,
It's very nice to see that we, as peers, can speak so eloquently to one another.

on Friday, December 30th, Josefina's husband said

Ladies and Gentlemen, Andrew has now thrown all his toys out of the pram.

on Friday, December 30th, Andrew said

It isn't my blog. There are two ways to take what I said, and I think you picked the wrong one deliberately. Many of the people commenting here, also write blogs.
I think young, because I am still full of idealism, but I am old enough to know what I am talking about. Don't be so high and mighty. Can't you speak to me as if I were your peer? There is an awful lot of personal slighting in your words, and if you're really so mature, I'd think you would be well beyond that sort of thing. I always learn from my peers...some of whom are my students, some my mentors. If our minds are open, we're all on the same level. Arrogance and being secure about what you say are two different things. Arrogance almost always comes from being insecure. Responding to a quote using a quote clearly demonstrating how one can hide behind mystical 'others' was for me easier and more amusing to do than being longwinded and boring. Just a tool, for you, hypocrisy, for someone else, maybe not. Your words deserve a response, and this is it. Have I covered everything?

on Friday, December 30th, Derek said

Talent certainly isn't necessary in todays world, just look at all the young hopefuls out there who think they deserve to be heard above everybody else! The world certainly moves faster than it used to, and yes, I feel sad that apprenticeship seems to be dying out - in many professions as well as art.

on Friday, December 30th, josefinabonet@4email.net">Josefina said

Well Andrew, I didn't realise this was your blog!
By the way, you inferred that a previous person was ignorance masking as wisdom for responding with a quote by Oscar Wilde, even though your rhetoric to that person began quoting the ancient Chinese proverb. When you grow up, you'll realize that it pains older folk to listen to your egotistical ranting. And who am I to tell you anything? Well your "adolescance" is as clear as punch. So take a tip from Hyacinthe and learn from your peers. As the old lady said to the art student, "Your cup may be full, but it's plastic and has a hole in it!"

on Friday, December 30th, Andrew said

Josefina, when I write a blog, I am happy when people find comments on it to which they'd like to respond. Some of the best ones are emotion driven. Blogs often do become, in a way, forums, and the dialogue, if heated, expresses the differences that exist between the views of the readers better than toned down versions do. Gloves off, masks too! And who are you, anyway, to tell me what I should be or shouldn't be writing? An angry mediator?
Encantado, Andres

on Thursday, December 29th, Matt said

Wow, such interesting comments! Some of them have hit the nail on the head and some have gone in a direction that I don't think even the writer knows where he/she is going.

It's plain to see that ART is highly subjective i.e. the viewer reserves the right to see it whichever way he/she chooses regardless of education (whatever education that may be). What is good art to one is bad art to another and so on. Read: subjective

The business of art has (most likely)always been a game... the only thing that has changed is the time in which the business is done. The bottom line is you have to participate in the game if you want to make it just as Hyacinthe does.

on Thursday, December 29th, Zan said

Wow, you sure stirred up a hornet's nest! I think art should speak for itself, but it's all in the eyes, and judgement, of the observer.

One person's peerless masterpiece is another's objet de trash, and unfortunately, popularity rules an artist's chances at success...

So, sadly, I agree, talent is not necessary to be a successful artist today.

on Wednesday, December 28th, josefinabonet@4email.net">Josefina said

I think Hyacinthe's work is beautiful! As for the last comment, I think you're supposed to comment on the blog, not behave like an angry mediator. This isn't a forum!

on Wednesday, December 28th, Andrew said

This is for C. Wilson and Sergio, though as the oriental master said, as he kept pouring the tea into the student's already overflowing cup, " Why did you come? You are like this cup. I cannot teach you anything, for your cup is already full."
C., you say you shouldn't learn from the past. Ok, then you should learn from the present. To be revolutionary, that is have entirely new ideas, you must go it alone. You can't repeat what other people say. I've heard the song you're singing ad nauseum sung by hordes, and I don't even think they can remember whose revolutionary ideas they're repeating. And by the way, Bob Dylan IS the past.
As for Sergio, quoting someone famous out of a complete context is simply ignorance made to sound like wisdom because it has a well known name attached to it. Does a singer sing for themselves alone? Does a painter not wish to have a dialogue with those who view his work? If art is a language using other than words to communicate ideas, who do those ideas go to if not to others besides the artists themselves? What you're talking about, this 'creation' in the absence of an audience, strikes me as remarkably similar to what men do with porn in the absence of women. An artist who communicates to others, whose work 'speaks' is no less than one whose works remain silent...he is in fact much more.

on Wednesday, December 28th, amkawon@verizon.net">Walter Oliver Neal said

Artists understanding their craft is no guarantee that he or she will be able to discern the difference between good and bad art--ever hear of Thomas Kincaid. He understands his craft; he's rich; and he turns out crap. I assume you understand your craft (unless you're an art critic); yet your statement disparaging Basquiat: "that a childlike drawing by a drugged out Basqiuat has great value" betrays you as a person of shallow perceptions, with a lay persons level of Art Appreciation 101. The next time you approach art, try not letting your prejudices and feelngs of superiority get in the way of appreciating the inner struggles that Basquiat managed to etch into his canvas and make great art!

on Wednesday, December 28th, bobadilla@operamail.com">Sergio said

Or to quote Oscar Wilde (he said it better)
"A work of art is the unique result of a unique temperament. Its beauty comes from the fact that the author is what he is. It has nothing to do with the fact that other people want what they want. Indeed, the moment that an artist takes notice of what other people want, and tries to supply the demand, he ceases to be an artist, and becomes a dull or an amusing craftsman, an honest or dishonest tradesman. He has no further claim to be considered as an artist."

on Wednesday, December 28th, jcrispin@runbox.com">J C Wilson said

"Art has become a game and the players are bigger than ever" - Oh, the wheel of fortune! As for the comment about artist's who do not understand their craft because they don't have the qualities of their predecessors? That's simply patronizing. How wrong to quote Bob Dylan, then glory in the past.

on Wednesday, December 28th, Haynespamella@yahoo.com">Pamella Haynes said

Thank you so much for your article. I find that many of my fellow aritists feel that training some how does more damage than good. I think that is crazy, dancers have to learn to dance, singers have to learn to sing and actors fine tune there acting skills with ongoing training for the duration of their careers and painters should learn to draw and paint. I take classes where ever I go. I am a healthcare traveler and travel to a new state every three months. I went to the School of The Art Institute of Chicago and studied early material and techniques. And one day I will be able to live off my art, but I take great pride in my work and will not exhibit work that is just thrown together. This breaks my heart

on Wednesday, December 28th, paul said

Hyacinthe,as always there are some good points in your blog,truthfull and self evident,about all the ins and outs and ups and downs of being an artist and artlife in general,but I certainley dont agree with you about Basqiuat,and it always weakens an artists position when they put down another artist to support their own work and arguments as you have done,especially one who is now part of the pantheon whatever anyone thinks of him he is up there and in art history,and I think deservedley so,as an extremeley original artist,but he doesnt need my support its all official.The other thing that I get when reading your blogs is arrogance creeping in,especially about your own work,which is often for any artist distasefull,but if I am to seperate your attitude from your work,it gets better,the best peice Ive seen on here of yours was the dogs painting,where the content of the painting obviously counteracted the technique which is too slick and stylized in general for my taste,in general your blogs if the arrogance and posturing and there has been name dropping in the past,which also goes against the grain,could let up,then the blogs are informative and usefull and entertaining.

on Tuesday, December 27th, Mark R Brockman said

Can An untrained opera singer become famous? Probably not. But they could become a pop star. So it is with all arts. There is a place for us all. Some will make a living, some will not. I have been at this business of painting for over thirty years, I don't make lots of money, but I do not do it for the money, no matter how nice the money would be. I do not do it for fame, even though some fame would be nice. I do it because that is what I am and it is what I do. I care little if others like it, get it, or not. I am self taught, oh yes, and not afraid to say so. I studied under no one, unless you consider studing paintings in museums and books and magazines schooling, in that case I have studied under hundreds of artists. There are many artists who have studied under a great artist only to paint bad versions of the master they studied under, what good is that. Art comes from within, not from schooling, but from desire. Will there be bad art that makes money (Thomas Kinkade)? Yes. will there be great artists no one will ever know about (Maybe me :)? Yes. So lets get over it. Lets just make the best art we can and do the best with it that we can. An artist's only concern should be the work. Thank you.

on Tuesday, December 27th, elaniii@yahoo.com">Andrew said

Tony. Wake up. Basquiat doesn't have much to say. If you view his work objectively, you come to the conclusion that it's sophomoric and targeted at people swimming in pretty shallow water. As profound as your comment. K.R. the answer is leave the US. No one will see you as a prophet in your home town, but they may if you come from very far away. John, every medium has limits, some severe, others mild, and the artist just has to work within them. I firmly believe that the creative process is identical in dance, in music, in cooking, in sculpture, and in painting. Different sets of limits, that's all. Hyacinthe, a good blog, lots to think about, even the comments got my attention.

on Monday, December 26th, john said

.... and so this brings us to the (nowadays troubling?) question, of what is art?
Is it technique?
Is it creativity? or both?
(I do not believe it can be neither.)
In opera singing there are few "degrees of freedom", I believe, to create art . . . however in the plastic arts, especially with modern concept and performance pieces, there are essentially no boundaries.

...! but we must also distinguish between art and the art market(s) . . .two definately distinct beasts !

Commercial kitsch, museum pieces, european copies . . . . all have their admirers and subtractors . . and all will find their home.

on Monday, December 26th, TFG said

"Could an untrained opera singer be catapulted to a stage and praised for a raw performance? Would that singer be acclaimed for a valid interpretation of a great composers work? I think not."

And this from someone who openly admits she's not studied art and has made her own assumptions?

on Monday, December 26th, K.R. Burde said

I totally agree with Hyacinthe... It seems that in our age of "political correctness" it is much harder to get your work seen.. (especially if you are a middle-aged white American male in our country). True, there are those emerging artists that are due recognition, however, in America today, the practicing artist (performing and visual artists alike)cannot get far without Agents,Lawyers and other professional hawkers of art. The Gallery scene for a good part, is by appointment only, and seems to be more interested in hanging art for commission than for allowing common people (the not politically or corporately connected) to view art. An artist can belong to many organizations,societies, and clubs, and still go unrecognized. We can all persist in what we do... but until our society gets over this PC stage, Art is only in the eye of the investor rather than the beholder!

on Monday, December 26th, Tony L. said

how can you put down Basqiuat?
your work is pure kitsch!

on Monday, December 26th, Brad Michael Moore said

Thanks Hyacinthe for sharing with us some important and well described exchanges between the ever-changing art world and those who participate there - past and present. Once again, artists must blaze their own trails beyond the intersections now ‘closed’ until further loopholes can be created. How little our success may depend upon us… Still, if we’re not making the effort to be seen – how good are our chances then?