login   password  artist portfolio  gallery portfolio  MYabsolutearts 
absolutearts.com
 
  NEWEST TRENDS |AMP| nbsp; help   |  media kit   |  about us   |  services   |  contact  
  NEWEST TRENDS .         SEARCH   .   BUY   .   JOIN   .   COLLECT   .   RESEARCH   .   READ  .   DISCUSS  

Art Blogs - Artblogs - Art Weblogs - absolutearts.com - wwar.com

 
Home » Archives » September 2005 » My Week in Los Angeles

[Previous entry: "Art World Economics Part Three"] [Next entry: "Art and nature walk "The Legend""]

09/02/2005: "My Week in Los Angeles" by Sue Spaid


Before sharing the highlights of my Los Angeles trip, I respond here to my critics of which a surprisingly large number have surfaced, as evidenced by the preponderance of negative comments posted in response to my blog.
To my Critics:

Next year, I celebrate twenty years of curating exhibitions, so perhaps the reason that I seem so well connected or have cause to name drop is that I’ve been involved in the artworld for a very long time. In fact, I have experienced every possible role- collector, independent curator, art writer, gallerist, art educator, performance artist, museum curator and exhibiting artist. I’ve organized hundreds of exhibitions for myriad spaces ranging from the non-art Staten Island Ferry and Pavilions grocery store to infamous venues like the Bellevue Art Museum or the Contemporary Arts Center.


My entire life is organized around one purpose- to experience as much art as possible, which is why I both dwell in Cincinnati and travel so much. Scraping together enough money to pay my mortgage and travel expenses requires me to work as a lifeguard/swim instructor, tax accountant, cook, companion to a woman with Parkinson’s Disease, reader (for the elderly), photographer’s assistant, art writer (not all pay), itinerant lecturer, salon coordinator, and university adjunct. Of course, all of these jobs are seasonal and none guarantee future employment. While this lifestyle is quite interesting and the tax benefits are enormous, I’d hardly call this a privileged life as my detractors suggest. I drive a beat-up 1988 Honda and finally bought a new computer, so I no longer conduct my on-line life at the public library.
By the time www.absolutearts.com provided me this (non-paying) gig on their site, several people had already suggested that I blog my art travels. My blog describes my ordinary routine, which I would perform with or without this blog. Blogging doesn’t make my daily life any less interesting or more important. Since reviews and articles in major art magazines rarely boost careers, I never imagined that blog citations could be considered advantageous. The inefficient artworld accords critics, let alone bloggers, little say-so. Collecting is a different story. Moreover, I indicated from the beginning that this blog is commentary, not review. Rather than name drop, as some have opined, I like to acknowledge people who play a vital role in my art life. No one mails me press material, so no one (save the annual Art in America upcoming exhibitions calendar) influences my travel plans. My professional research requires travel, so the IRS honors write-offs with or without this blog. In short, this tedious task offers no obvious benefits.
Ultimately, my blog’s model is PBS’s Rick Stees, who explores regions from several vantages, such as archaelogy, architecture and local color such as food and drink. I hardly expect people to read this blog monthly, but I hope to inspire other art travelers. Several museums use my blog to organize “collector trips.” A search for whatever city in the www.absolutearts.com archive grants immediate access to past articles mentioning that city. A click onto my blogs provides automatic access to cultural institutions (live links) plus additional information such as local bars, stores and architecture. I don’t expect anyone to mimic my activities anymore than Rick Stees or the Lonely Planet folks do. I rather offer starting points, enabling art lovers to tap current information.
Some of you have suggested that it would make a better video than a text. I would think I’d died and gone to heaven if someone actually gave me a television show to visit museums!!! I would drop everything for this opportunity. There are times when some of you are annoyed that I visit a state and skip a nearby institution. This usually means that my trip didn’t coincide with some friend’s schedule. For example, I would have visited the Cranbrook Art Museum or the Madison Contemporary Art Museum in July had either Elena Ivanova or Jane Simon been available. Electing not to visit the Cranbrook made visiting the Arab American National Museum a possibility, while our arriving late in Madison meant missing Jane. I hope to visit both within the year.
I welcome future comments and will try to respond to them as they arise. Organizing this material as a travel blog requires some effort, so it’s informative when people provide comments that improve its content. Someday, all of this may become an art travel book, but it will always be more useful as an on-line resource than a fixed text.

My Week in Los Angeles
Having lived in Los Angeles for over nine years, I visit at least once a year to catch up with old friends and to experience new art. What struck me this year was less the art and more the way artists are becoming real estate magnates! I won’t go into details, but it’s a boon to the economy to witness all of the renovations and additions under development.
Sunday was spent preparing for an outdoor barbecue in the garden of Angie Bray and Steve Dewitt’s Venice home. Monday, I checked out Nancy Evans’s new curiously-adorned bronze sculptures, as well as her gorgeous second-floor addition. We then took a wonderful bike ride along the Venice boardwalk, which included strolling on the Santa Monica Pier. While walking back to Angie’s house, I checked out every shop and restaurant along Abbot Kinney Boulevard. After coffee with Beyond Baroque director Fred Dewey, we returned to Angie’s to eat her husband’s delicious pizza before heading to the Nuart Cinema for Won Kar Wai’s newest film “2046,” which inspired each of us to offer a different interpretation.
Tuesday began with dozens of visits to Bergamot Station galleries, as well as the Santa Monica Museum of Art’s wonderful exhibition of drawings by notable female artists Hilma af Klint, Emma Kunz and Agnes Martin. Also of interest were Jen Pack’s thread paintings at Sarah Lee Artworks, Katy Bowen’s optical felt paintings at Gallery 825, Dame Darcy’s dandyette provocations at Richard Heller Gallery and Shoshana Wayne’s fascinating group show, “No Man’s Land,” comprised of works by recent grad students. After sharing a lunch of steak salad and artichokes at Angie’s, Phyllis Green and I headed to Culver City to visit the new gallery frontier. We only got as far as Cliff Benjamin’s Western Projects before I realized that I had left a camera at Angie’s. Thus, our route to LACMA to view Tim Hawkinson’s survey, which looked way better here than at the Whitney Museum of American Art (May 2005), began strangely with a detour via Venice. I later attended a Bach and Vivaldi concert with gallerist Jan Baum, her husband Dick, a collector, and dealer Laura Schlesinger at the Hollywood Bowl, which was nearly drowned out by the sound of hovering helicopters, extinguishing a fire in nearby Nichol’s Canyon. I viewed all of this alone from the bowl’s cheapest ($6) seats and joined them afterwards for desert at the collector’s home.
After a fun breakfast, Wednesday, at the Farmer’s Market Crepe Counter with Dana Bain and her two sons, we visited the adjacent sticker shop. After lunch, I met up with Lynn Aldrich at Maura Bendett’s amazing exhibition at Roberts & Tilton. Together, we visited nearby galleries 1301, Karen Lovegrove, Daniel Weinberg, Carl Berg and Paul Kopeikan, whose exhibition of book imagery was particularly enjoyable. After catching up over tea and cookies at Mani’s Bakery (a former employer), we checked out Culver City galleries Anna Helwig, Blum + Poe, Q.E.D., and Susanne Vielmetter. Lynn dropped me at Jan Baum’s gallery, where I viewed “Figuring the Female,” which included two of Lezley Saar’s striking paintings. En route to Jan’s house, we stopped by Ace Gallery and got a sneak peek at Ken Feingold’s upcoming exhibition, which was truly enticing even though only two works were installed. Jan, Dick and I later feasted at Mandarette with painter/song writer Bob Crewe, who’s in the news whenever again some young singer covers one of his memorable hits!
Early Thursday morning, curator/critic Terry Myers and I headed off to MOCA’s Jean-Michel Basquiat exhibition, which I had also seen in New York. Much more impressive was Blake Byrne’s diverse collection, which included a Gordon Matta-Clark “splitting,” several early works by Juan Muñoz, a Steve McQueen video and myriad Jim Shaw works. En route to little Tokyo for lunch, we stopped at Red Cat across the street to see Margaret Kilgallen’s posthumous installation. Our Chinatown tour included newer spots like Sister, Peres Projects and San Francisco’s Jack Hanley Gallery, as well as familiar venues China Art Objects, Black Dragon Society, Acuña Hansen and 4-F, where we chatted up John Souza. At LACE, Terry traded me to curator/writer Michael Duncan, who agreed that we should visit Rhonda Saboff at DIRT. And fun it was… At Michael’s house, we viewed a recent renovation, a wonderful Mary Baumeister sculpture, his exhibition catalogs for Richard Pettibone and Eugene Berman, and later devoured a memorable dinner at Madeo, which is evidently Italian dealer Emi Fontana’s favorite.
A bit more low-key, Friday began with a hike in Griffith Park, from where Kahty Chenoweth and I watched helicopters extinguish yet another fire. Painter Selma Moskowitz joined Jan and I for lunch at Sonora. Before going to UCLA/Armand Hammer to see Patty Chang’s Shangra-La video, Kahty and I caught the incredibly sexy film “Nine Songs.” We returned to Jan’s for a delicious home-cooked meal. I spent Saturday breakfast with old friends on the new patio of Kokomo’s at the Farmer’s Market, before meeting up with Armory Curator Jay Belloli at the studio of artist Caryl Davis. Before hopping a plane, I attended “Wine, Word and Wonderful Women,” a local artists’ event which took place at Jacci Den Hartog’s home and involved various activities like tasting soup made from a mélange of canned vegetable soup, eating dishes created from church or temple cookbooks, and reading selected texts. Unfortunately, I had to board a plane before it got into full swing.


Santa Monica Museum of Art- www.smmoa.org
Gallery 825- www.laaa.org
Shoshana Wayne- www.shoshanawayne.com
Museum of Contemporary Art- www.moca.org
Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions- www.artleak.org
Los Angeles County Museum of Art- www.lacma.org
UCLA/Armand Hammer Museum- www.hammer.ucla.edu

Replies: 19 Comments

on Sunday, September 11th, Anne said

Dear Sue: There are many things that bother me about your blogs, mainly the fact that you were in Houston in May of 2005, and did not contact me. Also, you were seen about LA and did not contact my sister either. I have two pairs of shoes for you. It was about 5 years ago this past May that I met you and your parents at MFA and inhaled a delicious lunch. The next time you are in town, please call or email in advance and I will pick you up at the airport, etc. I have a place for you to stay in West Univ. Please email. We all miss you.

Anne

on Thursday, September 8th, walt said

Neli,
You've hit the nail on the head...we have become so large and diverse, have allowed so much attention to diversity, that no one artist or movement can speak for or to us all. In the 40's and 50's Regionalism was still an important topic. Both politics and a certain kind of natural selection (it was already a major financial and cultural center nationally as well as internationally due to the end of WWII) helped New York City to become the Artistic Center not only of the United States but the world. There was actually (you probably know this) a concerted effort to end Regionalism both as a school of art and as an artistic economy.

I visited Hungary in 92. It was my first trip of this continent. I was amazed at how the City of Budapest had supported and sponsored its artists of repute. They were given teaching positions, state grants to due public projects and submitted to the various bianales around the world. Realize that the entire country of Hungary is comparable to the state of Ohio. If the state of Ohio put as much into promoting their own artists as the country of Hungary does I would not be such a looser as Andy II puts it. Neither would Andy.

I visited the city of Dresden Germany a few years ago (97 I think) and the city was very loyal to it's own artists. Many of the neo Expressionists were originally from Dresden. Under the communists they were not treated so well and many moved to Berlin. But I think the city changed its opinion when the wall came down and didn't want to loose the tradition started by de Brucke, the first expressionist group from the 20's. They were all (most of them at any rate) students at the art college in the center of the city on the Elbe. If Columbus supported its own artists as much as Dresden does theirs Andy II and I would not be such loosers.

My epiphany was that in fact I have a local reputation, even a fair reputation at the state level. But unlike Hungary or Dresden to be considered a truly important artist in my own city and region I have to make it to New York.

Now, with the internet and Globalization, we cannot even speak of a national art let alone a regional art. Now it is World Art. And while I have fond memories of many of the regional artists and their focus on people and local lifestyle, we are no longer satisfied with that alone, anywhere in the world. Now that Dresden and Budapest have re-entered the world stage I doubt that they will be able to sustain the same loyalty that I observed a few years back.

It is not that no one cares...it is because this new ability to know what is going on around the world 2 minutes after it has happened has changed our entire focus. And there is a momentum that pulls us along, both artists and audience...like a river...the internet...and like a river one has to pay attention to the water, the canoe, the paddles, the shifting weight of whatever supplies one is carrying in the boat...in other words the focus shifts to the very thing that has changed our focus. The medium is truly the message. It is no longer the art or the artist we are interested in but the vehicle that carries it to us and us to the world.

on Thursday, September 8th, neli said

I wonder why Andy Wharhol II bothers to post on a "loser" site?
Is it possible that our posts-in-earnest to Sue's Blog are in themselves a form of art? If anything, Sue's super-kinetic + time-constrained turns around a pat L.A. art scene, reveal an enthusiasm albeit filtered through the same ol'. In any case, she's nudged honest debate here. How can we "losers" turn this discussion into a forum that surmounts the re-treaded artists and articles at Art Forum, Art In America, Coagula, Art News, or other assumed experts and become a template for moving past the status quo to more relevant territory which MUST involve blogs, forums and other instruments of the Internet? Such as THis. Can we begin with this question: WHAT BEST DESCRIBES MEANINGFUL ART IN THIS 21ST CENTURY? IN A TIME OF INCREASING GLOBALISM AND STANDARDIZATION DOES RELEVANT ART NECESSARILY CONTAIN ITSELF WITHIN A NATIONAL OR REGIONAL CONTEXT? For example: Would Andy Warhol be relevant today? Frank Stella? Richard Serra? What makes Laura Owen, Richard Pettibone, Uta Barth and Yoko Ono's art meaningful today? What, if anything, is unique to our new century which might inform our art - both in America and beyond our borders? Are the fictitious politics of our leaders and media the tragic hallmarks of the superficiality of our time? And, at last, are you aware of ANY one artist who exemplifies in his/her work this unique moment in our history?

on Thursday, September 8th, nel@ameritech.net">neli said

I wonder why Andy Wharhol II bothers to post on a "loser" site?
Is it possible that our posts-in-earnest to Sue's Blog are in themselves a form of art? If anything, Sue's super-kinetic + time-constrained turns around a pat L.A. art scene, reveal an enthusiasm albeit filtered through the same ol'. In any case, she's nudged honest debate here. How can we "losers" turn this discussion into a forum that surmounts the re-treaded artists and articles at Art Forum, Art In America, Coagula, Art News, or other assumed experts and become a template for moving past the status quo to more relevant territory which MUST involve blogs, forums and other instruments of the Internet? Such as THis. Can we begin with this question: WHAT BEST DESCRIBES MEANINGFUL ART IN THIS 21ST CENTURY? IN A TIME OF INCREASING GLOBALISM AND STANDARDIZATION DOES RELEVANT ART NECESSARILY CONTAIN ITSELF WITHIN A NATIONAL OR REGIONAL CONTEXT? For example: Would Andy Warhol be relevant today? Frank Stella? Richard Serra? What makes Laura Owen, Richard Pettibone, Uta Barth and Yoko Ono's art meaningful today? What, if anything, is unique to our new century which might inform our art - both in America and beyond our borders? Are the fictitious politics of our leaders and media the tragic hallmarks of the superficiality of our time? And, at last, are you aware of ANY one artist who exemplifies in his/her work this unique moment in our history?

on Wednesday, September 7th, ono-i said

I wonder why Andy Wharhol II bothers to post on a "loser" site?
Is it possible that our posts-in-earnest to Sue's Blog are, in themselves, a form of art? If anything, Sue's super-kinetic + time-constrained turns around a hackneyed, L.A. art scene, reveal an enthusiasm albeit filtered through the same ol', same ol'. In any case, she's nudged honest debate. How can we "loser" types turn this discussion into a forum that side-steps all the re, re, re-treaded materials at Art Forum, Art New, Art this 'nd that and become a template for moving past the status quo? Maybe we can start with this question: WHAT BEST DESCRIBES MEANINGFUL ART IN THIS 21ST CENTURY AND, IN A TIME OF INCREASING GLOBALISM, DOES IT NECESSARILY CONTAIN ITSELF WITHIN A NATIONAL OR REGIONAL CONTEXT?

on Tuesday, September 6th, Andrew said

Sue, I must say that you haven't responded to my criticism, which I thought was both polite and concise, neither here or on my aa page e mail. At this point, I have to assume you're not going to. You said you'd try, which means you either haven't had the time, or don't intend to. To sum up, my view was that you perpetuate the status quo, and one of the main characteristics of those who do that, is that they don't respond to criticism. You're still welcome to prove me wrong.

on Tuesday, September 6th, Andrew said

Five comments on Sue's blog and seven on Andy's, eh? I've said my piece on Sue, now I'll say it on Andy -

Thanks, folks

on Monday, September 5th, Michael Fornadley said

Sue,

Should think about writing a blog about how to travel on a stringshoe budget, most of us artist types could benefit from your success. Generally I find your blogs interesting, for the life of me I do not know any of the artists you comment on, but that is me I usually stop at the turn of the century heavy weights. Any negative reaction could be because some of us see the larger art community being a two class society, the haves and have nots. One side you have the elite, the ones who have the skills to network who play the game of corporate art ladder climbing. They appear to have much better skills with the verbal and therefore excelled in the educational arena, in a world system where those skills are in demand they will always have the advantage for promotion. The other side as Andy calls them "the losers" haven't required or have no inclination to obtain those skills, you see this is not a art thing I see it in the corporate world. It is not how skilled or talented you might be, but is how well you play the game that marks success. It is about networking, knowing the right people and fit into the cookie cutter mold of being politically correct.

It is possible that the so called "folk movement" is a reaction to the over intellectual work that is dominating the world world today. Really the facts are that most artists cannot compete in that realm, rocket scientists we are not, otherwise we would not be pursuing art as a profession. Most of the major figures from the past are prime examples that it does not require great intelligence to produce great art. Could be why I find so demeaning statements about an artist's lack of professionalism. From my own personality I am probadly secretly striving to be unprofessional in my art marketing, hyprocrisy really grieves me.

Could be that Andy's post is closer to the truth at many will want to believe, but with a different outlook of what a loser is and it does not depend on commercial success.

on Sunday, September 4th, weldons@gate.net">Quentin Walter said

My whirlwind trip to LA was similar to yours via farmers market, Bergamot Station, Venice Beach, etc., but I was Mercedes Devereau trying to connect to a gallery for representation. Peter Frank did return my call after I returned to my home in eastern Florida and I've sent him an artist's packet. I wore my Basquiat inspired visual to LA MOCA with not much notice. Did get a shot of a "team" from New York for the opening at Shoshana Wayne. Art is still about names and networking as far as I can tell.

on Sunday, September 4th, Brad Michael Moore said

Sue,
Your effort is consistent. It has a bit of a gossip column style that doesn’t reach me, but, that’s ok. I applaud your effort.
AWII – admitting you’re a loser can make you one – at least to yourself. To call anyone else here a loser – people making sincere efforts, still only makes you the loser. Your self esteem needs some polishing – I hope you can find a way to recognize your self-worth… We all have something to offer – you as well. Famous artists, famous people, all have the same faults and weaknesses as “us commoner’s” here at aa (and some of the “others” are here too – why should they identify themselves to you?). Most people are curious who make inroads as artists in these creative or other additive fields. There are successful artists here leading successful lives in many ways - you can not judge people without knowing them – that’s so lame. I have been known to make a negative comment, now and then, still, even when doing so I also try to infuse something positive as well. Otherwise, what’s the purpose. If it’s a cry for help you’re making – you need to cry closer to home where anyone can more easily identify your needs. Still, not many have the patience to take much time to deal with others in self-pity mode – you gotta use your brain to overcome that kind of weakness. We are so capable of improving our self worth when we make efforts to help others with problems greater than ours. It’s really pretty simple – do for others what you’d wish them to do for you…

on Saturday, September 3rd, Gabriella Morrison said

Andy;

Are you by any chance a "chip off the old block"?
He truly was a true blue chip artist.

on Saturday, September 3rd, walt said

go for it Andy. Don't hold back! Sometimes you just gotta vent.

on Saturday, September 3rd, Olga said

Hmm..:), Andy. Why you did not make any reference to yourself (www or at least e-mail address)? Are you afraid of something?
I totally disagree with you. It's logically uncorrect generalization based upon some restricted set of examples. To be successful or to be a looser - it's how you feel. And you know well, your feelings and mood can change from time to time. Things and values that determine your understanding of success are very relative, subjective.

on Saturday, September 3rd, Andy Warhol II said

Let's face it. we're all losers! Everyone here is a loser! Loser artists, loser collectors. loser curators, etc. We either back slap each other or occasionally are critical, but the common denominator is that we are all losers! And this is a loser web site for losers! You don't think so? How many famous rich artists or collectors are anywhere near this site?

Oh you can say you just want to be happy and paint, or collect art, or skittle the country following other artists, but you're lying! Anyone and everyone with any connection to art, any minor association at all, wants fame and fortune. Fess up! You know it's true.

So anyone here that writes, comments, or has space on this loser web server, is trying to satisfy their lust for fame, be it, a small sliver of a second of those 15 minutes.

Yeah I'm a loser also and I feel like more of one as I write or read anything on this site. We are all just a bunch of losers making each other feel more comfortable that we are a loser.

Doubt my words? Find me a blue chip artist or top tier collector anywhere on this loser site!

on Saturday, September 3rd, walt said

Hey Soutine, good to hear from you. Yes, Maslo's hierarchy and all that. Food and shelter first. Then other things fall into order until you get to feeding the ego. As you well know an artist must have a pretty healthy ego to move forward in life.

on Friday, September 2nd, Soutine said

Fuel for the ego is not only money!

hmmm....

....fame...and....fortune...

It is not money that fuels the ego!

------------------

on Friday, September 2nd, walt said

Art is either a luxury or a passion. If you're rich it is a luxury. So that leaves the rest of us to pursue it as a passion. That Sue's blog has a readership outside of the artists on wwar.com is really quite impressive. That she, like most of us who show our work on wwar, is peacing together her income peacemeal and wholesale lets me know that it is a passion not a luxury.

What she says about not getting paid to write our blogs for wwar is correct. We do it because we like the site and feel that anything that promotes it is good for all the artists and significant others who are using the site. The audience is maybe not as refined as one for Arts Forum or Art in America or any of the other slick magazines as there are so many amateurs and younger artists using the site to promote their work and extend their passions. I'm a serious artist but also an educator. I like the chance to speak to those who might benefit from a little education. The more saavy artists and collectors may not always find enough food for their metabolisms here. On the other hand sometimes they might. I read more than one source most times. That way I diversify my reading portfolio. Sue's blogs serve a certain audience. Me? I'm just writing what I want to write about, what ever I've stumbled across either on the road, in my studio, at school...I'm not sure who's listening most of the time. I could get really deep if I wanted to but have noticed that when I do I tend to end the thread on the forum. So I decided to keep it relatively light reading. I have other places where I can get really deep. Usually with the artists who have a history with me and I know they get it. And that usually happens in my studio, on my patio or in the local bar. And that is really where most of the important art talk always occured...in the Paris cafe's, the New York City bars, or the studios of artists behind the iron curtain when nobody from outside the circle was eavesdropping. Public consumption is a different thing altogether. Some of the folks who want to talk deeper issues e-mail me, and I assume some of the other bloggers via our guest books on wwar. I'm always open to those communiques. It's a big and complex world. It works at many levels. Critiques are welcome. But do remember who the wider audience is.

on Friday, September 2nd, Jose M said

Sounds exhausing, but fun. Did you buy any art?

on Friday, September 2nd, Andrew said

Sue, I'll admit I did accuse you of name dropping. What bothers me about your style, especially if you've been involved in curatorship, is that you tend to be drawn towards the most easily accessible venues for viewing art. In that case, I can't imagine that your curatorship would have been anything other than seeking the most famous artists you could come up with to put together a show. Sure, the public would love such a selection, because it's hard for most people to be attracted to work by people they've never heard of. But I've yet to read you write about going to an unknown artists enclave, or visiting someplace like the Mark bar in Green Point as Walt did. So in that sense, what you write about, and probably what you have curated, leads inevitably to the sustenance of something that is neither new, nor cutting edge, but rather promoted as such long after it has already run its course. As an artist, that sort of thing rubs me the wrong way, because it reduces my possibilities while strengthening those of my too well established adversaries. Your response to what I say is welcome, because only through dialogue do our positions become clearer. My feeling is, that as a curator, you were never in a position to have made any difference anyway, without diminishing your own chances to continue curating. That's not your fault...there really are very, very few people in the artworld superstructure who can afford to make waves.