[Previous entry: "New Carlsberg Glyptotek..."] [Next entry: "Sandro Chia in Pietrasanta, Italy"]
08/10/2005: "Source of Inspiration, Part I"
A work of art captures the moment, the emotion, the thought, empowering it with an eternal meaning that touches minds and souls of others. An artist translates ideas into his/her personal language of expressions, shapes and colours that can be read by somebody outside the immediate circle. We react to work of art because we are familiar with the emotion it represents. We had experienced something similar ourselves or we are weary and cautions about possibility of coming across it one day. It makes our imagination race ahead while our memory retraces moments past.
An artist chooses images and styles we see in his/her work. The more unique and individual they are the more spontaneous and consuming all is our reaction. But how does the artist decide to which image/idea give the priority, which one is allowed into the world of his/her artistic expressions? The life is so intense, filled with emotions to the brim. How to capture that powerful image, that precious moment? Some artist keep diaries, use some other forms of documenting world swirling around them, others do a lot of developmental work or employ cross-discipline and cross-genre techniques. Artist draws inspiration from his/her personal experiences and interpretations of the surrounds, even if he/she can point to a at first glance seemingly unrelated and detached event, piece of information, etc. as a source for a certain image.
Does everything that happens in the artist’s world eventually reappear in some way or other in his/ her body of work, being documented and observed in some shape or form? Is there really a part, a tiny corner of artist’s being to which Graham Green referred as “a chip of ice”, due to which an artist even in most dramatic and most private personal moments is able to evaluate the situation as a possible material to be used in future work of art. Images and experiences settle down into some creative bank from where they can be retrieved when needed to be transformed and adapted to the required style.
However we would like those images to be honest and first hand, very real and as personal as possible. We want to see the soul in the work of art. Are we asking too much – to put inner and secret self on the show? It’s an emotional ride isn’t? The reality is that the more open and honest is language use by the artist the more direct and wider lines of communication are available in the creative process. Is there a cost to it that we are not always aware of? Yes, I feel we need to talk about it a bit more.

















